Practical disputes about restaurants, cafés, hotels, waste and considerate service.
Voting openCASE 002 · Hospitality
A sealed bottle can feel reassuring, but it also adds cost, packaging and transport. Where local tap water is safe, should a shared jug arrive unless diners opt out?
International water-safety and waste context · Only where the relevant local authority confirms that tap water is potable and the restaurant can serve it hygienically.
Hear both sides →Verdict deliveredCASE 006 · Hospitality
A generous plate can signal value and hospitality, but an unwanted portion can become waste. Should diners be able to choose a smaller serving without awkwardness?
International food-service evidence and case studies · Cuisine, shared-dining customs, pricing, food safety and the restaurant’s measured waste profile should shape any offer.
Hear both sides →Voting openCASE 011 · Hospitality
An unfinished meal may become tomorrow’s lunch or immediate waste. Should staff make taking it home a normal offer rather than waiting to be asked?
International food service · Food-safety rules, storage, transport and packaging options remain local.
Hear both sides →Voting openCASE 016 · Hospitality
A disposable cup or plate is quick and hygienic when systems are stretched. A washable one can avoid repeated packaging. Should reuse be the ordinary dine-in choice?
International environmental context, with an EU regulatory example · Food safety, water and energy use, washing capacity and rules for very small businesses must be assessed locally.
Hear both sides →Voting openCASE 027 · Hospitality
Disposable forks and chopsticks often arrive where reusable ones are already available. They are also essential for some customers and situations. Which choice should the order screen make first?
Asian takeaway and delivery examples, with cautious relevance to other food-service markets · Customers must be able to request accessible, hygienic cutlery easily; local food-service and materials rules still apply.
Hear both sides →